Aotearoa BiodiverCity / Design Guide / Design Strategies /

Detention ponds



A detention pond with gently sloped vegetated edges temporarily storing and slowly releasing stormwater while providing freshwater habitat in an urban setting in Aotearoa New Zealand.

Definition

Detention ponds are engineered stormwater facilities that temporarily store and slowly release runoff to reduce peak flows and manage water quality.

What this strategy does

Provides flood attenuation and water treatment, and when designed with ecological principles, can support freshwater and riparian biodiversity. Avoids single-purpose, hard-edged basins with rapid drawdown and no vegetated margins.

Context

In Aotearoa New Zealand urban catchments, detention ponds are widely required for stormwater management and are often one of the few opportunities to integrate freshwater habitat into developed landscapes. When ecologically designed, they can contribute to urban freshwater biodiversity without compromising hydraulic performance.1

Technical considerations

Design considerations

Pond size and depth

Design ponds with sufficient area and a range of depths to create multiple aquatic and edge habitats, rather than uniform basins.1

Shoreline form

Use gently sloping, irregular margins instead of steep or lined edges to increase habitat heterogeneity.1, 2

Vegetation structure

Prioritise native aquatic and riparian planting, including emergent, marginal, and buffer vegetation, to support food webs and shelter.1, 3

Hydroperiod diversity

Where feasible, incorporate permanent and seasonally inundated zones to support different plant and invertebrate communities.1

Landscape integration

Locate ponds to connect with other green or blue spaces to improve the movement of freshwater and terrestrial species.1, 4

Implementation considerations

Design priority

Balance hydraulic performance requirements with ecological design early, rather than retrofitting biodiversity outcomes later.1

Key constraint

Stormwater quality and inflow variability can limit habitat suitability if not managed through upstream treatment and flow moderation.5

Relevant tools or standards

Use council stormwater manuals and water sensitive design guidance to confirm sizing, safety, and maintenance requirements while integrating ecological features.

Issues & barriers

Water quality stressors

Urban runoff pollutants and elevated nutrients can favour tolerant or invasive species and reduce ecological value if untreated.5

Altered hydrology

Rapid drawdown and frequent water level fluctuations disrupt wetland processes and aquatic communities.1

Connectivity limitations

Many detention ponds are isolated within the urban fabric, restricting dispersal and reducing long-term biodiversity value.4

Conflicting objectives

Operational priorities for flood control and maintenance can override biodiversity outcomes if not explicitly specified.1

Disease risk

Standing water can support mosquito populations, with potential implications for avian disease in New Zealand contexts.6, 7

Synergies & opportunities

Climate change – Attenuates increased rainfall intensity and supports urban climate adaptation through water storage and vegetated cooling.8

Disaster risk reduction – Reduces peak flood flows and downstream flood risk during extreme events.8

Freshwater security – Improves downstream water quality and supports urban freshwater ecosystems when well designed.1

Financial case

Ecosystem services &/or performance value

Value type

Reduced flood damage, deferred infrastructure upgrades, and added environmental performance from multifunctional stormwater assets.8

Cost-effectiveness

Investment logic

Designing ponds to deliver both hydraulic and ecological functions improves return on investment compared with single-purpose infrastructure.1

Monitoring & evaluation metrics

Core metric

Aquatic and riparian species richness and community composition (plants and macroinvertebrates).

Advanced or long-term metric

Water quality trends (nutrients, suspended solids) and persistence of native vegetation structure over time.

Additional resources or tools

Stormwater Management Devices in the Auckland Region (GD01)
Design guidance for stormwater devices with water sensitive and ecological principles.
https://knowledgeauckland.org.nz/publications/stormwater-management-devices-in-the-auckland-region-gd01/

Auckland Council — Water Sensitive Design for Stormwater (GD2015/004)
Guidance integrating native planting and ecological outcomes into stormwater design.
https://knowledgeauckland.org.nz/media/1701/gd2015-004-water-sensitive-design-for-stormwater.pdf

Wellington City Council — Water Sensitive Urban Design Guide
Local guidance on bioretention, wetlands, and detention ponds.
https://wellington.govt.nz/climate-change-sustainability-environment/water/stormwater/water-sensitive-urban-design-guide

Auckland Council Stormwater Device Sizing Tool
Concept-stage sizing tool aligned with Auckland regional requirements.
https://tools.aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/storm-water-device-sizing-tool/#/

References

1. Oertli, B., & Parris, K. (2019). Toward management of urban ponds for freshwater biodiversity. Ecosphere, 10(7), e02810. https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.2810
2. Hassall, C. (2014). The ecology and biodiversity of urban ponds. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Water, 1(2), 187–206. https://doi.org/10.1002/wat2.1014
3. Hill, M. J., Biggs, J., Thornhill, I., et al. (2017). Urban ponds as an aquatic biodiversity resource in modified landscapes. Global Change Biology, 23(3), 986–999. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.13401
4. Hyseni, C., Heino, J., Bini, L. M., et al. (2021). The importance of blue and green landscape connectivity for biodiversity in urban ponds. Basic and Applied Ecology, 54, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.baae.2021.10.004
5. Hess, K., Sinclair, J., Reisinger, A., et al. (2022). Are stormwater detention ponds protecting urban aquatic ecosystems? Urban Ecosystems, 25, 1155–1168. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-022-01208-9
6. Bennett, J., Niebuhr, C. N., Lagrue, C., et al. (2024). New insights into avian malaria infections in New Zealand seabirds. Parasitology Research, 123(4).
7. Filion, A., Webster, T., Poulin, R., & Godfrey, S. S. (2023). Interannual patterns of avian diseases in wild New Zealand avifauna near conservation areas. Austral Ecology, 48(7), 1413–1425.
8. Baida, M., Chourak, M., & Boushaba, F. (2024). Flood mitigation and water resource preservation using nature-based solutions under climate change. Water Resources Management. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-024-04015-3