Aotearoa BiodiverCity / Design Guide / Design Strategies /

Community gardens



A community garden with shared food-growing plots and native planting supporting soil health, invertebrates, and birds in an urban neighbourhood in Aotearoa New Zealand.

Definition

Shared, collectively managed green spaces that integrate food production and habitat features to support urban biodiversity.

What this strategy does

Provides small-scale, fine-grained habitat within neighbourhoods while supporting social participation and food growing. Avoids single-use, ornamental-only planting and short-term temporary installations.

Context

In Aotearoa New Zealand cities, community gardens frequently occupy fragmented or low-value land but can contribute meaningfully to urban biodiversity when designed and managed for ecological function rather than solely production or amenity1.

Technical considerations

Design considerations

Plant diversity

Use structurally and functionally diverse planting (native and non-invasive exotic) to support multiple taxa and seasonal resources1, 2.

Habitat features

Integrate logs, coarse woody debris, varied vegetation layers, and undisturbed soil zones to increase habitat complexity3.

Spatial permeability

Limit impervious surfaces that restrict soil processes4.

Landscape context

Locate gardens to complement nearby green spaces or corridors to increase ecological value beyond the site4, 5.

Implementation considerations

Design priority

Plan gardens for long-term use, perennial planting, and ecological stewardship rather than short-term yield only1.

Key constraint

Land tenure insecurity reduces willingness to invest in long-lived habitat features1.

Relevant tools or standards

Local council community garden guidelines and urban greening frameworks.

Issues & barriers

Insecure land tenure

Temporary or informal garden status discourages investment in habitat features with long establishment periods1.

Competing objectives

Food production, aesthetics, and safety concerns may conflict with biodiversity-supportive practices2.

Knowledge gaps

Limited ecological guidance for gardeners can reduce biodiversity outcomes2.

Synergies & opportunities

Human wellbeing – Regular participation is associated with improved wellbeing and social connection6.

Empowerment – Collective management builds local capacity and stewardship6.

Food security – Gardens can supplement household food supply, though benefits vary by context7.

Financial case

Ecosystem services &/or performance value

Value type

Pollination support, soil health improvement, and reduced reliance on chemical inputs3, 7.

Cost-effectiveness

Investment logic

Low-cost interventions embedded within existing land uses can deliver multiple co-benefits when tenure is secure1.

Monitoring & evaluation metrics

Core metric

Plant species richness and structural diversity across growing seasons3.

Advanced or long-term metric

Soil biological indicators (e.g. soil fauna presence, organic matter trends)3.

Case Studies

Daldy Street Community Garden

Kaicycle Urban Farm

Sanctuary Mahi Whenua Community Garden

Additional resources or tools

New Zealand – Community food systems

Gardenstar Tool

Biodiversity self-assessment and improvement guidance

Urban greening

WSP Urban Greening Tool

Evaluates green infrastructure integration

Plant selection

NZ Plant Conservation Network

Native plant identification and species lists

Monitoring

iNaturalist NZ

Citizen science biodiversity recording

References
  1. Philpott, S.M., Bichier, P., Perez, G.E., Jha, S., Liere, H. & Lin, B.B. (2023). Land tenure security and luxury support plant species and trait diversity in urban community gardens. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems.
  2. van Heezik, Y., Dickinson, K.J.M. & Freeman, C. (2012). Closing the gap: communicating to change gardening practices in support of native biodiversity in urban private gardens. Ecology and Society, 17(1).
  3. Tresch, S., Frey, D., Bayon, R.L., et al. (2019). Direct and indirect effects of urban gardening on above- and below-ground diversity influencing soil multifunctionality. Scientific Reports, 9.
  4. Goddard, M.A., Dougill, A.J. & Benton, T.G. (2010). Scaling up from gardens: biodiversity conservation in urban environments. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 25(2), 90–98.
  5. Garrard, G.E., Williams, N.S.G., Mata, L., Thomas, J. & Bekessy, S.A. (2018). Biodiversity sensitive urban design. Conservation Letters, 11.
  6. Egli, V., Oliver, M. & Tautolo, E.S. (2016). The development of a model of community garden benefits to wellbeing. Preventive Medicine Reports, 3, 348–352.
  7. Lin, B.B., Bichier, P., Liere, H., Egerer, M.H., Philpott, S.M. & Jha, S. (2024). Community gardens support high levels of food production, but benefit distribution is uneven. Sustainability Science.